Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2008 Extreme Championship Wrestling results
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 12:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- List of 2008 Extreme Championship Wrestling results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unneeded list, articles for 2006 and 2007 results have already been deleted. –– Lid(Talk) 02:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If other sports have pages for what has gone on during their season, why shouldn't wrestling get a page for its results?--Crazy4metallica (talk) 06:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since when has professional wrestling been a sport? Delete per nominator, there's already too much wrestlingcruft on Wikipedia. JIP | Talk 17:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You just want this deleted because you are clearly biased against wrestling. I don't go looking for pages about subjects I don't like to delete.--Crazy4metallica (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since when has professional wrestling been a sport? Delete per nominator, there's already too much wrestlingcruft on Wikipedia. JIP | Talk 17:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per WP:NOT#IINFO. It's not so much whether wrestling is a sport or not (and frankly JIP, this is not the place to dig up that argument again), it's that individual episodes of a wrestling show are more akin to individual games in other sports. Should we have an article that lists the individual results of all 1,230 games being played in the current NHL season? To use a TV example (since wrestling tends to be just as much a drama as an athletic spectacle), should we have an article that lists (in detail) what happened in each episode of Naruto or House? Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of information and simply listing results of a TV show happens to be that. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I don't see anything wrong with keeping this article. As long as it's accurate and sources. iMatthew (talk) 14:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per NeoChaosX. D.M.N. (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Cruft. Nikki311 20:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Bleek25 (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can we have a reason? D.M.N. (talk) 16:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Cheers, LAX 22:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki311 20:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.